A work laptop can start to feel like it’s yours. The employer hands it to you on day one. You carry it everywhere. It travels on vacations. You build your shortcuts. You store your notes. You probably should not use it for shopping or personal photos — but many employees do. After a while, it feels personal. Giving it back can feel worse than being wrongfully fired.
Employment law does not recognize emotional ownership.
An employee who believes they were wrongfully fired for employment discrimination may feel the employer owes them something. But under employment law, even after retaliation or race/color discrimination claims, employer property still belongs to the employer.
That hard line comes from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Wynn v. University of Toledo, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 5951 (6th Cir. Feb. 26, 2026). Wynn worked in human resources. The employer terminated him in January 2021. He filed charges alleging race discrimination and retaliation. After that, the dispute moved from workplace discrimination to a criminal warrant.
The employer asked for its laptop back. Wynn declined to return it before his official separation date. Police contacted him multiple times. The laptop was still not returned after employment ended. A felony warrant issued. When Wynn eventually brought the laptop to the police station, he was arrested. The charges were later dismissed.
Wynn argued the arrest was retaliation.
The Sixth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for the employer.
But let’s pause for clarity. If you were wrongfully fired because of discrimination or retaliation, that is serious. Employees win employment discrimination cases. Race discrimination is unlawful. Retaliation for reporting discrimination violates employment law. When an employer crosses that line, you may have a powerful case and should immediately contact an employee’s rights lawyer near you to help build your case brick by brick with hard evidence.
The key is keeping the spotlight on the employer’s misconduct — not shifting it to your own.
Let’s unpack why Wynn’s retaliation claim failed.
What Is Post-Termination Retaliation Under Title VII Employment Law?
Retaliation under employment law protects an employee from punishment because they reported discrimination.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes it unlawful for an employer to retaliate against an employee who “opposed any practice made … unlawful” or “made a charge” under the statute. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a). That includes complaints about race discrimination and other forms of employment discrimination.
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a plaintiff must show: “(1) [he] engaged in protected activity, (2) the defendant was aware of the protected activity, (3) the defendant took an action that was materially adverse to the plaintiff, and (4) there is a causal connection between the plaintiff’s protected activity and the defendant’s adverse action.” Wynn, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 5951, at *8–9.
That word — “because” — drives retaliation law.
If an employer acts because an employee reported or opposed race discrimination or participated in an investigation into gender discrimination or national origin discrimination, that is illegal retaliation. If an employer acts because of something else, the analysis changes.
Practical Tip: Employees pursuing retaliation or wrongful termination claims should document who made decisions, when those decisions occurred, and what was said. Evidence wins employment law cases.
Best Employment Retaliation Lawyer Blogs on Point:
What Are Examples Of Post Employment Retaliation?
Post-employment retaliation is not rare. An employer cannot punish a former employee for filing a discrimination charge.
Examples include blacklisting an employee in the industry, giving knowingly false references, refusing to pay earned compensation because of protected activity, filing baseless lawsuits to intimidate an employee, or interfering with future job opportunities. Those actions can violate employment law and constitute employment discrimination.
In Wynn’s case, the alleged retaliation was an arrest. An arrest is materially adverse. Any employee would agree that being jailed is serious. But retaliation law requires proof that the employer acted because of the discrimination complaint — not simply after it.
Practical Tip: If you believe you were wrongfully fired, protect your credibility. Strong retaliation cases show employer misconduct — not employee missteps.
Best Employee’s Rights Attorney Blogs on Point:
If I Was Wrongfully Fired, Can I Keep My Work Laptop — And What Is Pretext?
This is where Wynn’s argument collapsed.
He suggested that because he eventually brought the laptop to the police station, the arrest should not matter. In other words: no harm, no foul.
That logic does not hold.
Returning employer property after a warrant has already issued is like a burglar returning the television after charges are filed; or a bank robber bringing the duffel bag of cash back to the station. If a jewelry store employee leaves with three diamond rings because he believes the store owes him, and later drops them off at the police station, that does not erase what happened. Feeling owed does not create ownership. The same is true with a laptop. Theft is theft.
The Sixth Circuit examined whether the arrest stemmed from retaliation or from separate conduct. The court held that the University “offered a legitimate, non-discriminatory explanation for its request for an arrest warrant: Wynn failed to return his work-issued laptop after his employment ended.” Id. at *10.
That holding draws a clean line.
Employment discrimination law protects employees from retaliation. It does not insulate employees from consequences tied to independent actions.
The Sixth Circuit focused on the failure to return employer property after repeated requests and after employment ended. At that point, Wynn had to prove pretext.
The court explained that a plaintiff may attempt to show pretext by demonstrating that the employer’s reason had no basis in fact, did not actually motivate the action, or was insufficient to justify it. Id. at *11 (citing Provenzano v. LCI Holdings, Inc., 663 F.3d 806, 815 (6th Cir. 2011)).
Wynn could not make that showing.
This is the hard truth about retaliation and wrongful termination cases. Once an employer presents a concrete reason for its action, the employee must dismantle it with evidence. Emotion is not enough. Suspicion is not enough. Employees cannot rely on vibes or beliefs. This is where experienced employment law attorneys make a difference.
Employees who were wrongfully fired for discrimination should absolutely fight back. But the best retaliation cases are clean. They show the employer acted unfairly. They do not give the employer a new, independent issue to point at.
Practical Tip: Return all employer property immediately. Then speak with an experienced employment law attorney before making strategic decisions. The best cases are built deliberately.
Best Wrongful Termination Law Firm Blogs on Point:
What Kind Of Lawyer Is Best For Retaliation And Wrongful Termination Cases Like This?
If you are an employee facing retaliation, discrimination, race discrimination, or wrongful termination, you need more than encouragement. You need the best strategy.
Employment law cases are technical. Employers defend aggressively. Proving retaliation or employment discrimination requires understanding motive, documentation, and pretext.
Spitz, The Employee’s Law Firm is one of the largest law firms in the United States dedicated exclusively to employee rights. That focus matters. Our attorneys have vast and successful trial experience standing up to employers. We offer free initial consultations and a no fee guarantee because employees should not risk financial ruin to challenge discrimination. If you believe you were wrongfully fired or subjected to retaliation or race discrimination, contact an employment law lawyer who understands how to expose weak employer defenses and build powerful cases.
Employment Lawyer Disclaimer
This employee’s legal rights blog provides general information about employment law, retaliation, discrimination, race discrimination, wrongful termination, and employment discrimination. It is not legal advice. Every employee’s situation is unique. Reading this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with any lawyer or attorney at Spitz, The Employee’s Law Firm.
No promises or guarantees are being made regarding outcomes in any retaliation, discrimination, or wrongful termination case. Past results do not guarantee future success. If you believe your employer violated employment law, consult a qualified employment law attorney or lawyer for advice specific to your situation.
This blog is a legal advertisement.