Many people assume that only individuals in protected classes – such as those facing discrimination due to race/color, gender, national origin, religion, or age – can file complaints or be protected from retaliation under laws like Title VII. But as the case of Minniti v. Crystal Window & Door Systems shows, even if you’re not part of the protected class, standing up against discrimination can still offer legal protections.
In Minniti, Gerald Minniti was not a victim of racial discrimination himself, but he refused to fire two African American employees after they submitted medical documentation excusing their absences. When Minniti’s supervisor, Andy Shashlo, ordered their firing regardless of the medical excuses, Minniti opposed the directive, stating that it could be perceived as racially discriminatory. Minniti raised the concern that firing the only two Black employees would “look bad” and could be seen as racial discrimination, to which Shashlo replied that “he didn’t care” and dismissed the possibility of the employees being able to sue due to financial limitation. Minniti at 101. Less than a week later, Minniti was fired. He sued for retaliation and wrongful termination under Title VII.
How Do You Prove Retaliation Under Title VII?
To prove retaliation under Title VII, an employee must establish three key elements: (1) they engaged in a “protected activity,” such as opposing discrimination or participating in an investigation or lawsuit related to discrimination; (2) they suffered an “adverse employment action,” meaning that the employer took some action that negatively impacted the employee’s job (such as firing, demotion, or harassment); and (3) there is a “causal connection” between the protected activity and the adverse employment action. This means the employee must show that the adverse action was a result of their participation in the protected activity. If the employee can establish these elements, the burden shifts to the employer to offer a legitimate, non-retaliatory reason for the adverse action. Finally, the employee has the opportunity to prove that the employer’s stated reason is a pretext for retaliation.
Best Work Retaliation Lawyer Blogs on Point:
- Proving Discrimination And Retaliation Claims Under Title VII
- Retaliation Is Still Easier To Prove Than Discrimination
- How Do I Prove Illegal Retaliation By My Job Under Title VII?
Does Title VII Protect Employees Who Are Not in the Protected Class?
Yes, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act doesn’t just protect individuals who are members of protected classes from discrimination; it also protects employees from retaliation when they oppose discriminatory practices, even if those practices are directed at others. In fact, the law is clear: an employee doesn’t need to be part of the protected class to oppose unlawful practices. Opposing discriminatory actions on behalf of others—whether it’s based on race, gender, age, or any other protected category—can be considered “protected activity” under Title VII. The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reaffirmed this principle in Minniti, stating that Minniti’s refusal to carry out the racially discriminatory order fell under Title VII’s protections.
As the court noted, Title VII’s anti-retaliation provisions protect employees who “explicitly or implicitly allege[ ] that a protected characteristic was the basis for the adverse employment action” (Minniti at 135). Therefore, even though Minniti was not African American, his opposition to firing the two Black employees based on a perceived racial motive was legally protected.
Best Race Discrimination Law Firm Blogs on Point:
- Employers Cannot Retaliate Against Spouses, Siblings, Significant Others
- Retaliation Not Excused By Also Firing Harasser
What Is A Protected Activity?
Protected activity under employment law refers to actions taken by an employee to oppose unlawful practices, such as discrimination based on race, gender, age, or disability. Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, employees are protected from retaliation when they “oppose” what they reasonably believe to be discriminatory conduct. This opposition can take many forms, including filing a formal complaint, participating in an investigation, or—as in this case—refusing to carry out an order that seems racially motivated.
Best Workplace Rights Attorney Blogs on Point:
How Clear Does My Opposition to Discrimination Need to Be?
One of the central issues in Minniti was whether Minniti’s opposition to the firings was clear enough to be protected under Title VII. The district court had previously ruled against Minniti, stating that his comments were too vague to constitute protected activity. Specifically, the district court found that Minniti had not “clearly communicat[ed] to Crystal ‘a belief that the employer has engaged in a form of employment discrimination,’” and that “no reasonable person could have believed that [Minniti’s] actions were in opposition to racial discrimination.” Minniti at 271-72.
However, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed, ruling that Minniti’s refusal to fire the employees and his expressed concern that it would “look bad” due to the employees’ race was sufficient to constitute protected activity. The Court emphasized that “an employee’s opposition must not be equivocal or vague” but also recognized that direct opposition like Minniti’s could easily be understood as resistance to racial discrimination. Minniti at 343. The court found that a reasonable jury could interpret Minniti’s opposition to the firings as clear and specific, particularly given his additional conversation with Human Resources in which he said he was “worried that [Shashlo] was racist.” Minniti at 354.
Best Employee’s Rights Lawyer Blogs on Point:
- Why Reporting Race Discrimination To HR Is Critical
- Be Clear: Don’t Give Your Employer A Reason To Think You Quit
What is pretext in a retaliation case, and how can you prove it?
Pretext in a retaliation case refers to the employer’s false or misleading explanation for why they took adverse action against an employee. To prove pretext, the employee must show that the employer’s stated reason for firing or demoting them is not the real reason, but rather a cover for retaliation.
In Minniti, Minniti’s employer, Crystal, initially claimed that his termination was due to a company-wide layoff to ensure financial stability. However, evidence suggested that this explanation might have been pretextual. For instance, just days after Minniti was fired, the company hired a new production manager and gave raises to two other employees who assumed some of Minniti’s duties. Furthermore, Minniti’s supervisor, Shashlo, gave inconsistent reasons for the firing, stating during his deposition that Minniti was terminated because he “wasn’t performing or wasn’t doing the job that we brought him in to do.” Minniti at 268. The conflicting explanations and the hiring of new staff undermined the employer’s claim that financial difficulties were the cause, creating a basis for a jury to find that retaliation was the real motive.
Best Wrongful Firing Attorney Blogs on Point:
- Employer’s Lies Are Called Pretext
- How Do I Prove Pretext For My Wrongful Termination?
- How Do You Prove Causation In A Retaliation Claim?
Lessons From Minniti v. Crystal Window & Door Systems
- Protected Activity Applies to Everyone: You don’t need to be the victim of discrimination to be protected under Title VII. Opposing discrimination against others can also be protected activity.
- Be Clear When Opposing Discriminatory Practices: If you’re opposing discrimination in the workplace, make sure your opposition is clear and specific. Vague or ambiguous comments may not qualify as protected activity under the law.
- Timing and Inconsistent Reasons Matter: In Minniti, the close timing between Minniti’s opposition and his termination, coupled with Crystal’s inconsistent explanations for the firing, helped establish a possible case for retaliation.
Disclaimer:
This retaliation blog is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Viewing or reading this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Spitz, The Employee’s Law Firm. Each case is different, and specific legal advice should be obtained for your unique circumstances. If you believe you’ve been retaliated against or discriminated against at work, contact Spitz, The Employee’s Law Firm for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.