
Depositions are stressful and can be tricky. Employee’s rights lawyers know that clients often say things that can hurt their case. It’s not unusual for someone to admit they were late a few times or didn’t get along with a coworker. But one thing employees can’t afford to admit in a race/color discrimination case is that the boss is not racist or that the decision to fire you wasn’t based on race. Unfortunately, that’s exactly what some employees blurt out. And once you make that kind of admission, your race discrimination claim is likely dead in the water.
The case of Evans v. School District of Philadelphia, No. 23-1086, 2024 WL 4199010, (3d Cir. Sept. 16, 2024), highlights exactly how this kind of admission can derail a case. have Evans, a teacher in the Philadelphia School District, claimed she was wrongfully terminated based on race. However, during her case, she admitted that she didn’t believe the key people involved in her termination were motivated by race. That concession sealed the fate of her claim. If you admit that race wasn’t a factor, it’s almost impossible to argue that you were fired because of your race.
Evans was hired as a teacher by the School District of Philadelphia in 2020. She didn’t have a full teaching certification, so she worked on an emergency permit, which is used when no certified teachers are available. Throughout the school year, Evans was evaluated by her consulting teacher, Leslie Strothers, as well as her Assistant Principal, Sheree Howard, and Principal, Betsaida Ortiz. All three evaluators gave Evans poor ratings, including “Needs Improvement” and “Unsatisfactory” marks.
Based on these evaluations, Strothers recommended that Evans be dismissed from her position, and Evans was eventually terminated. However, during her case, Evans admitted that she didn’t think Strothers’s recommendation for dismissal was based on race. She also conceded that Assistant Principal Howard’s evaluation wasn’t motivated by race or gender.
These admissions were devastating to her race and gender discrimination wrongful termination case. In a race discrimination claim, the employee must show that they were treated differently because of their race. By acknowledging that race wasn’t a factor in the evaluations or the recommendation for dismissal, Evans effectively handed the School District a win on a silver platter.
Best Wrongful Termination Lawyer Blogs on Point:
- How Can I Fix Bad Deposition Testimony?
- Can I Sue For Wrongful Termination If My Doctor Says I Can No Longer Work?
- Can My Wrongful Termination Case Be Dismissed Before It Gets To A Jury?
- How Do You Win A Wrongful Termination Claim?
The Importance Of Causal Connection In Race Discrimination Claims
In race discrimination cases, the key question is whether the adverse action—such as a termination—occurred under circumstances that give rise to an inference of unlawful discrimination. This usually involves showing that similarly situated employees of a different race were treated more favorably. In Evans’s case, she didn’t provide any evidence of such comparisons. More importantly, she admitted that the people responsible for evaluating her performance and recommending her dismissal weren’t influenced by race.
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Evans made it clear that Evans’s concessions were fatal to her claim. The court noted that Evans “failed to identify facts sufficient to establish a prima facie case of race or sex-based discrimination.” Evans at 3. Essentially, by admitting that race wasn’t a factor in her evaluations or dismissal, Evans couldn’t establish the necessary causal connection between her race and the termination.
Admitting that race wasn’t a factor in your termination makes it nearly impossible to prove that race discrimination caused the adverse action. In a race discrimination case, the burden is on the employee to show that race was the “but-for” cause of the adverse action—meaning that the employee wouldn’t have been fired if not for their race. If you admit that race wasn’t the reason, you’ve just removed the most critical element of your case.
In Evans, the Third Circuit concluded that the School District had a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for firing Evans—her unsatisfactory performance. Without any evidence that race played a role, and with Evans herself admitting that it didn’t, there was no basis for her race discrimination claim. The court explained, “A plaintiff must convince the finder of fact ‘both that the reason was false, and that discrimination was the real reason’” Evans at 3. Evans couldn’t do either.
Best Race Discrimination Attorney Blogs on Point:
- How Do You Prove Causation In Wrongful Termination Cases?
- What to Look for If You Think You Are Being Discriminated Due to Your Race?
- Being Fired For Lying Is Not Race Discrimination Nor Retaliation
- Why Reporting Race Discrimination To HR Is Critical
What This Means For Employees
If you’re pursuing a race discrimination case, it’s essential to avoid undermining your claim by admitting that race wasn’t a factor. Even if you don’t believe your boss is racist, you need to stay focused on the fact that the adverse action—whether it’s a firing, demotion, or other mistreatment—was based on your race or membership in a protected class.
Your case depends on proving that the employer’s reasons for firing you were just a cover for racial discrimination. Admitting that race didn’t play a role in the decision takes away the most important part of your case and makes it extremely difficult to prove pretext.
If you find yourself in a situation where race may have been a factor in your termination or mistreatment at work, it’s crucial to have an experienced employment attorney on your side. At Spitz, The Employee’s Law Firm, we understand how to handle these complex situations and can help you protect your rights. Contact us for a free consultation, and we’ll help you build a strong case.
Disclaimer
The information in this blog is intended to provide general guidance and does not constitute legal advice specific to your circumstances. Whether you’ve been subjected to race discrimination, sex discrimination, or wrongful termination, you should seek the counsel of an experienced employment lawyer who understands the complexities of Title VII and other anti-discrimination laws. Every employment case is unique, and the outcome will depend on the specific facts of your situation. At Spitz, The Employee’s Law Firm, we specialize in representing employees in discrimination, retaliation, and wrongful termination cases. Contact us today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options. No guarantees are made regarding the outcome of any case, as each situation must be evaluated on its own merits.