Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, employees are protected from retaliation because they opposed or filed a charge of employment discrimination or harassment. With that said, the filing of a charge of race/color discrimination does not provide blanket protection for an employee to act like a jerk. The Title VII antiretaliation protections are not so broad as to allow a manager to treat their subordinates so poorly that they can’t wait to get out of their department. So, can you be fired for being a bad boss even if you’ve filed an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) complaint yourself? Absolutely.
That’s the situation Lester Leach found himself in. He was a director at the U.S. Mint, and after years of complaints from his subordinates about his verbally abusive behavior, the Mint decided to take action. Leach, however, argued that all of this was just retaliation for his own discrimination complaint. In Leach v. Yellen, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit made it clear: just because you’ve filed a discrimination complaint doesn’t mean you have immunity from disciplinary action if you’re creating a hostile work environment for your team.
Leach started working at the U.S. Mint as the Director of the Security Division in 2006. Over the years, he became infamous among his subordinates for his condescending and verbally abusive behavior. Complaints piled up, but he continued to receive positive performance reviews—until 2013, when things took a turn.
Leach’s first-line supervisor, Bill Bailey, drafted a memo putting Leach on notice for his misconduct, warning him that further action would be taken if his behavior didn’t improve. But did Leach change? Not at all. In fact, things got worse. The EEOC even found that Leach discriminated against one of his subordinates in 2014. Yet, he continued to skate by with good performance evaluations.
In 2016, Leach filed his own EEOC complaint, accusing his bosses of racial discrimination after they denied him funding to attend a training. While his supervisors supported his funding request, other officials at the Mint, including the Acting Deputy Director David Motl, did not. Leach’s complaint against Motl wasn’t part of this lawsuit, but it set the stage for what happened next.
Later that year, one of Leach’s subordinates, Arnaldo Medina, emailed Leach’s supervisors, stating that he had been subjected to Leach’s “constant condescending and verbally abusive behaviors” and asked to be removed from Leach’s chain of command. Medina wasn’t the first to complain—he’d raised these issues before, and other employees had similar stories. This time, the Mint decided it had heard enough.
Best Employment Discrimination Lawyer Blogs on Point:
- Yes, You Can Be Fired For Stealing Time And Threatening Coworkers
- Yes, You Can Be Fired For Sending Sexually Offensive Emails
- Yes, You Can Be Fired For Rejecting Your Schedule
What Is The Line Between Legitimate Business Reason And Pretext?
The Mint opened an administrative investigation into Medina’s allegations and temporarily removed Leach from his supervisory role. Leach, of course, wasn’t happy. He quickly contacted an EEO counselor and alleged that the investigation and his removal were retaliation for his previous discrimination complaint. But was this really retaliation? The D.C. Circuit didn’t think so.
The key issue here was whether the employer had a legitimate reason for taking the adverse action or whether it was pretext. Pretext means that an employer’s stated reason for taking the adverse employment action is not the true reason and is merely a cover for discrimination or retaliation. To prove pretext, Leach needed to show that the Mint’s reasons for disciplining him were not legitimate and that the real motivation was retaliatory.
The Mint had a legitimate reason to investigate Leach’s conduct. Medina’s complaints weren’t new, and they were corroborated by other employees. The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) got involved, conducted a thorough investigation, and concluded that Medina’s allegations were substantiated. Based on the OIG’s findings, Leach was suspended for two days without pay for “conduct unbecoming a federal government manager,” among other things, and had his teleworking privileges revoked.
Leach argued that this suspension and the investigation were all payback for his 2016 EEOC complaint. But as the D.C. Circuit pointed out, employers can—and should—discipline employees when there’s credible evidence of misconduct, regardless of whether that employee has filed a complaint of their own. The Court emphasized that Leach failed to present sufficient evidence to show that the Mint’s reasons were pretextual, stating, “The plaintiff must demonstrate as part of that showing that the challenged actions qualify as adverse actions” and “must present sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to find that the employer’s asserted non-discriminatory reason was not the actual reason and that the employer intentionally discriminated against the employee on an impermissible ground” (Leach v. Yellen, 2024 WL 4274378, at *3).
In any Title VII retaliation case, an employee must show that the employer’s stated reason for taking adverse action is not the real reason. For example, if an employer claims that an employee was fired for poor performance but has no documented evidence to support this claim, it could be seen as pretext. But in Leach’s case, the Mint provided ample evidence that Leach’s behavior toward his subordinates was the actual reason for the investigation and disciplinary actions.
The Court concluded that Leach did not have enough evidence to suggest that the Mint’s legitimate, non-retaliatory reasons for his suspension were a cover for retaliation. The repeated complaints and the OIG investigation backed up the Mint’s actions, making it clear that this wasn’t a case of pretext.
Best Retaliation At Work Attorney Blogs on Point:
- Employer’s Lies Are Called Pretext
- How Do I Prove Pretext For My Wrongful Termination?
- Yes, You Can Be Fired For Saying “F*ck (Race) People”
- Yes, You Can Be Fired For Sexually Harassing Multiple Women At Work
What Does This Mean For Employees?
Here’s the bottom line: Just because you’ve filed a discrimination complaint, whether it is because of race, gender, national origin, religion, age, or disability, doesn’t mean you’re shielded from being disciplined for your own misconduct. Employers have every right to take action when there are legitimate complaints about your behavior, especially if those complaints come from multiple sources and are backed up by an investigation.
It’s critical to understand that retaliation claims under Title VII require more than just showing that you were treated poorly after filing a complaint. You need to show that your complaint was the real reason for the adverse action against you. If there’s a valid reason—like being a terrible boss—your retaliation claim is going to fall flat.
Best Employee’s Rights Law Firm Blogs on Point:
- Yes, You Can Get A Poor Review For Falling Asleep At Work And Leaving Early
- Yes, You Can Be Fired For Boinking Your Boss’s Ex
- Yes, You Can Be Fired For Screwing Up Brain Surgeries
Why You Need An Employment Lawyer
If you believe you’ve been wrongfully disciplined or retaliated against, having an experienced employment attorney on your side is crucial. They can help you understand whether the actions taken against you are legitimate or if they’re just a cover for retaliation. An attorney can also assist in gathering the right evidence to support your claim and ensure that your rights are protected throughout the process.
At Spitz, The Employee’s Law Firm, we specialize in employment law and have extensive experience handling Title VII claims. Our team knows how to navigate these complex situations and can provide the guidance you need. If you believe you’ve been wrongfully disciplined or retaliated against, contact us for a free initial consultation. We’re here to help you get the best possible outcome for your case.
Disclaimer:
The information provided in this employee’s rights blog is for general informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice regarding employment law, workplace discrimination, retaliation, or any other employment-related legal matter. For advice specific to your situation, you should consult with an experienced employment attorney who can evaluate your claims related to race discrimination, gender discrimination, sexual harassment, disability discrimination, or any other form of employment discrimination under laws such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act or the Americans with Disabilities Act. No promises or guarantees are being made about the outcome of your employment discrimination case, and this blog is considered a legal advertisement. If you believe you may have been the victim of employment discrimination, retaliation, or any other violation of employment law, contact Spitz, The Employee’s Law Firm for a free initial consultation with a qualified employment lawyer. Our attorneys specialize in workplace discrimination, retaliation, and other employee rights matters, and can help you determine the best legal options for your specific case.