Covid-19: We are still open and our employment attorneys are available for you. If you have been forced to work against the government orders or wrongfully fired, call us now. For more information on Coronavirus related employment laws, click here.

The Spitz Law Firm, LLC

Call The Right Attorney

No Fee Guarantee

The Sixth Circuit Affirms that Holding Supervisors and/or Managers to a Higher Standard than Non-Supervisory Employees is not Circumstantial Evidence of Discrimination.

| Feb 21, 2013 | Age Discrimination, americans with disabilities act, Gender Discrimination, lgbt lesbian, Military Status Discrimination, National Origin Discrimination, pregnancy maternity rights, Race Discrimination, Religious Discrimination |

As employment law attorneys, we regularly are encounter situations in which employees believe that they were not treated equally, in respect to their fellow coworkers.  What few people employees realize, however, is that the complained about treatment must be applied unequally based upon one’s inclusion in a protected class of people (race, gender, national origin, age, etc) and the unequally treated employees must be similarly situated. The “similarly situated” component to disparate treatment lawsuits essentially means that employees can be held to different performance standards and discipline depending on their managerial level and/or job responsibilities. This legal form of unequal treatment was recently upheld by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals (Ohio).

In Martinez v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc., the Sixth Circuit upheld the dismissal of a Cracker Barrel manager’s reverse race discrimination case when she was terminated for engaging in the exact same behavior as three African American employees. The three African American employees were not terminated, and the plaintiff, Mary Martinez, based her lawsuit primarily on circumstantial evidence that the failure to also fire her subordinate employees constituted reverse race discrimination. The company moved for summary judgment, arguing no reasonable jury could conclude the reason for the disparate treatment was race, because the reason was that supervisors are held to a higher standard, and Martinez was the only supervisor involved in the conduct. The court agreed, holding that the non-supervisory employees were not similarly situated to Martinez. Accordingly, their differing treatment is not circumstantial evidence of discrimination because of race. The court of appeal therefore upheld the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the company.

This case reaffirms that managerial employees may be held to higher standards than the employees which they supervise, and it provides a clear example of how employers may treat some of their employees unequally without breaking the law.

If you even think that your employment rights have been violated or that you might need an employment lawyer, then call the right attorney to schedule a free and confidential consultation at (216) 271-3742. The Spitz Law Firm is dedicated to protecting employees’ rights and solving employment disputes.

 Disclaimer:

The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact an attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use and access to this website or any of the links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.